January 13, 2026

Quality Audit Framework Webinar

Webinar
October 6, 2026

Conference of Valuation Agencies (CoVA 2026)

In-person Conference
December 9, 2025

Leveraging IPTI’s Resources to Tackle Property Tax Challenges

Corporate Member Event
Find out more
PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE

Paul Sanderson

As this will be my last newsletter before the festive season, please allow me to wish you a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. I look forward to seeing as many of you as possible at an IPTI event during 2026.

An interesting recent article has the not-very-festive title of “The Case Against Property Taxes”. The author, Vance Ginn, states: “Property taxes are not a reasonable price for local services - they are an outdated, overly coercive, and economically destructive way to fund government. They should end.” A somewhat controversial opening statement!

The author continues: “Property ownership is the cornerstone of a free society. It reflects the natural right of individuals to control what they create, earn, or voluntarily exchange with others. From that right flows responsibility, independence, and the ability to build a legacy. Yet today, homeowners must pay the government every year simply to keep what they already own. Property taxes are not a reasonable price for local services - they are an outdated, overly coercive, and economically destructive way to fund government. They should end.

  • Property taxes currently generate 70 percent of all local tax revenue, some or all of which would have to be replaced with other taxes under property tax repeal.
  • Replacing the property tax with newly granted local taxing authority is exceedingly difficult, because local sales and income tax bases vary widely across jurisdictions; there may, for instance, be no feasible sales tax rate by which an agricultural county or bedroom community could replace its property tax revenue.
  • Backfilling forgone local property tax revenue through new state taxes is difficult because it dramatically shifts overall tax burdens, undermines local accountability, and cannot easily adjust for changing population mixes.
  • All revenue alternatives are less conducive to economic growth than the existing property tax regime, but some transfer regimes are sharply degrowth.