UPCOMING EVENTS

December 2, 2026

2026 International Research Symposium

In-person Conference
November 18, 2026

Corporate Needs - Property Tax Leaders' Perspectives

Corporate Member Event
January 14, 2027

Appeal' or 'Not to Appeal'? - That's the Question

Corporate Member Event
Find out more
PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE

Paul Sanderson

I am pleased to draw your attention to a paper recently published by the London School of Economics and Political Science titled “Wealth and Property Taxation in the United States”.

The Abstract to this 71-page erudite academic research paper states:

“We study the history and geography of wealth accumulation in the United States using newly collected historical property tax records from the early 1800s onward. These records come from the administration of the General Property Tax - a tax that aspired to cover all types of property. We construct wealth series at the state, county, and national levels. At the state level, we use annual assessed values of wealth from state-level reports drawn from multiple sources. Because assessed values may differ from market values, we also require assessment ratios, defined as the ratio of assessed to market wealth. We obtain state-level assessment ratios from decadal U.S. Census wealth data (drawn from various census reports, including those on “Wealth, Debt, and Taxation”), in which the census carried out detailed valuation work, complemented with information on changes in assessment practices from the state reports, to build higher-frequency series of assessment ratios.

  • Property taxes currently generate 70 percent of all local tax revenue, some or all of which would have to be replaced with other taxes under property tax repeal.
  • Replacing the property tax with newly granted local taxing authority is exceedingly difficult, because local sales and income tax bases vary widely across jurisdictions; there may, for instance, be no feasible sales tax rate by which an agricultural county or bedroom community could replace its property tax revenue.
  • Backfilling forgone local property tax revenue through new state taxes is difficult because it dramatically shifts overall tax burdens, undermines local accountability, and cannot easily adjust for changing population mixes.
  • All revenue alternatives are less conducive to economic growth than the existing property tax regime, but some transfer regimes are sharply degrowth.